General
WARD et al. v. WARD et al. (two cases)
145 F. 1023·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WARD et al. v. WARD et al. (two cases).
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
May 22, 1906.)
Nos. 61, 62.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Austen G. Fox, for appellants.
Wm. G. Wilson, for appellees.
Before WALLACE and TOWNSEND, Circuit Judges. HOLT, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
A majority of the court, after a careful examination of the record, have reached the conclusion that the decrees below ought not to be disturbed, and concur in the views expressed in the opinion of the court below. The decrees are accordingly affirmed with costs. For opinion below, see 131 Fed. 946.