General
Bernard Breitbart and Charles Breitbart, Copartners, Doing Business as Breitbart & Breitbart, Respondents, v. Max Weill, Appellant
255 A.D. 801·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1938·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(October 21, 1938.)
Bernard Breitbart and Charles Breitbart, Copartners, Doing Business as Breitbart & Breitbart, Respondents, v. Max Weill, Appellant.
(Appeal No. 1.)—
[MAJORITY]
In an action for recovery for professional services rendered by plaintiffs as attorneys for the defendant in claims and actions in respect to disability insurance, the defendant demanded a bill of particulars containing certain items. On motion to vacate or modify the demands the court at Special Term modified and struck out certain demands. Items 6 and 7 should have been allowed. Order modified by allowing and including items 6 and 7 in respect to which plaintiffs are required to furnish particulars, and as so modified the order, in so far as an appeal is taken therefrom, is affirmed, without costs; the bill of particulars to be served within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ., concur.