General
FANNIE FARIS et al., Respondents, v. DAVID LAMPSON et al., Appellants
73 Cal. 190·Supreme Court of California·1887·CA
Belcher, C. C., and Hayne, C., concurred.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[No. 11892.
Department One.
August 16, 1887.]
FANNIE FARIS et al., Respondents, v. DAVID LAMPSON et al., Appellants.
Appeal—Failube op Appellant to File Points and Authorities— Affirmance without Examination of Record. —Where no oral argument is had, and the appellant fails to file any points or authorities, the judgment appealed from will he affirmed without an examination of the record.
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Calaveras County.
The facts are stated, in the opinion.
Wesley K. Boucher, for Appellants.
J. A. Louttü, S. D. Woods, and A. L. Levinsky, for Respondents.
[MAJORITY — Foote, C. The Court.]
Foote, C.
— In this case no oral argument was had, nor did the appellants file any points or authorities; and having thus omitted to point out the errors of which they complain, the judgment should be affirmed without an examination of the record. (Mokelumne H. C. M. Co. v. Woodbury, 10 Cal. 188; Edmondson v. Alameda Co., 24 Cal. 350; Holm v. Roach, 25 Cal. 37; Hickinbotham v. Monroe, 28 Cal. 489; Brewster v. Johnson, 51 Cal. 222; Estate of Montgomery, 59 Cal. 583.)
Belcher, C. C., and Hayne, C., concurred.
The Court.
— For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, judgment affirmed.