Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
M. M. Bright, Administrator of Robert Larck, Deceased, v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company
226 U.S. 602·Supreme Court of the United States·1912
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. —.
M. M. Bright, Administrator of Robert Larck, Deceased, v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company.
Submitted November 11, 1912.
Decided November 18, 1912.
Mr. Herbert Fitzpatrick for , the Railway Company, the petitioner.
No opposition.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam :]
Per Curiam :
The writ of error.applied for in this case is denied. Wilkinson v. Nebraska ex rel. Cleveland Society for Savings, 123 U. S. 286. In re Pennsylvania Company, 137 U. S. 451, 454.