Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Tax
WELLS BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
67 F.2d 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WELLS BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.
No. 5087.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Oct. 10, 1933.
Before ALSCHULER, EVANS, and SPARKS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
On motion of counsel for respondent, counsel for petitioner consenting, it is ordered by the court that this cause be docketed in this court, and that the petition of the Wells Brothers Construction Company foi review of the order of redetermination of the United States Board of Tax Appeals, entered on September 6,1929, be, and the saméis hereby, dismissed for want of prosecution.