Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Corporations
ALEMITE CORPORATION v. LUBRAIR CORPORATION
71 F.2d 997·United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ALEMITE CORPORATION v. LUBRAIR CORPORATION.
No. 2929.
Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
July 10, 1934.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The following order has been entered (July 10, 1934) : “Upon motion of appellant, assented to, It is ordered that the decree of the District Court of July 17, 1933, he, and the same hereby is, vacated, and the case is remanded to that court for entry of a final decree in accordance with said motion.” Note. — Attached to the motion is a consent decree declaring the patent valid, that it was infringed, and that a permanent injunction issue.