General
Guy B. Barham Co. and The Basket House v. United States
60 Cust. Ct. 1033·United States Customs Court·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Before the First Division,
April 10, 1968
No. P68/203.
protests 63/6678, 63/8684, and 63/18822 (Los Angeles).
Guy B. Barham Co. and The Basket House v. United States,
[MAJORITY — Watson, J.]
Watson, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “B” covered by the foregoing protests consist of rattancore coolie hat planters, sleighs, modern shaped trays, serving trays, snack trays, and hanging planters similar in all material respects to those the subject of Royal Cathay Trading Co. and W. J. Byrnes & Co. et al. v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 371, C.D. 2662); that the items of merchandise marked “C” consist of rattancore and reed Kleenex tissue box covers similar in all material respects to those the subject of Quon Quon Company v. United States (41 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2038); that the items of merchandise marked “F” consist of rattan suitcases and valises similar in all material respects to those the subject of Royal Cathay Trading Co. and W. J. Byrnes & Co. v. United States (45 Cust. Ct. 99, C.D. 2206); and that the items of merchandise marked “G” consist of trays, serving trays, display trees, etc., which are in no part of rattan, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Quon Quon Company v. United States (48 Cust. Ct. 440, Abstract 66729), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.