General
MITCHELL v. MITCHELL
160 F. 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1908
Before PRITCHARD, Circuit Judge, and WADDILL and MeDOWELL, District Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MITCHELL v. MITCHELL.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
May 28, 1908.)
No. 702.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of North Carolina at Raleigh.
James H. Pou and P. S. Winston (Pou & Fuller and Winston & Mathews, on the briefs), for appellant. Murray Allen (Day & Bell and J. B. Martin, on the briefs), for ap-pellee.
Before PRITCHARD, Circuit Judge, and WADDILL and MeDOWELL, District Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The learned judge of the lower court, in determining this ease, filed a full and comprehensive opinion, which will be found in 147 Fed. 280. The conclusions reached in that opinion, after careful examination of the record by us, are approved, and the judgment of the court affirmed.