General
In the Matter of Supplementary Proceedings: Esther Alpern, Judgment Creditor, Respondent, v. Edwin S. Denham and Edwin A. Denham, Judgment Debtors, Appellants, and Elsa Denham, Judgment Debtor
247 A.D. 806·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1936·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Supplementary Proceedings: Esther Alpern, Judgment Creditor, Respondent, v. Edwin S. Denham and Edwin A. Denham, Judgment Debtors, Appellants, and Elsa Denham, Judgment Debtor.
[MAJORITY]
Order appointing receiver in proceedings supplementary to execution reversed on the law, without costs, and motion denied, without costs. Inasmuch as the proceedings were brought in the County Court, a justice of the Supreme Court was without jurisdiction to appoint a receiver. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.