Administrative
Nicole A. DALMAZZI, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.
138 S. Ct. 2273201 L. Ed. 2d 675·Supreme Court of the United States·2018
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nicole A. DALMAZZI, Petitioner
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 16-961.
Supreme Court of the United States
June 22, 2018.
Brian L. Mizer, Johnathan D. Legg, Lauren-Ann L. Shure, Appellate Defense Counsel, Air Force Legal Ops. Agency, Joint Base Andrews, MD, Eugene R. Fidell, New Haven, CT, Stephen I. Vladeck, Austin, TX, Mary J. Bradley, Christopher D. Carrier, Defense Appellate Division, Army Legal Services Agency, Fort Belvoir, VA, for Petitioners.
Noel J. Francisco, Solicitor General, Dana J. Boente, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Edwin S. Kneedler, Deputy Solicitor General, Brian H. Fletcher, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Joseph F. Palmer, Danielle S. Tarin, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
It is so ordered.