Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William Moores, Appellant, v. John Townshend et al., Respondents, 1890 — 118 N.Y. 675 · caselaw · US
General
William Moores, Appellant, v. John Townshend et al., Respondents
118 N.Y. 675·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William Moores, Appellant, v. John Townshend et al., Respondents.
(Argued January 15, 1890;
decided January 21, 1890.)
Motion to dismiss appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of New York, entered upon an order made February 14, 1887, which ordered judgment for defendants, upon a verdict directed by the court.
L. A. Gould for appellant.
John Townshend for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal, unless tlie appellant within ninety-days procures a concise statement of the facts and of the question of law arising thereon, and of the determination of these questions by the General Term, to be prepared and settled and annexed to the judgment-roll, and a certified copy thereof transmitted to the clerk of the Court of Appeals, pursuant to the provisions of section 1339 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and pay fifty dollars costs.
All concur.
Ordered accordingly.