General
Mary Lanctot, Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. The Troy and Lansingburgh Railroad Company, Respondent
92 N.Y. 627·New York Court of Appeals·1883·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary Lanctot, Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. The Troy and Lansingburgh Railroad Company, Respondent.
(Argued March 12, 1883;
decided March 20, 1883.)
Rufus W. Peckham for appellant.
Esek Cowen for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm. Eo opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.