General
Raymond Yeargain and Industrial Commission of Colorado v. State of Colorado and State Compensation Insurance Fund
162 Colo. 447428 P.2d 89·Colorado Supreme Court·1967·CO
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 22335.
Raymond Yeargain and Industrial Commission of Colorado v. State of Colorado and State Compensation Insurance Fund.
(428 P.2d 89)
Decided May 1, 1967.
Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy, Peter L. Dye, Assistant, for plaintiff in error Industrial Commission of Colorado.
Harold Clark Thompson, Alious Rockett, Francis L. Bury, Feay Burton Smith, Jr., for defendants in error State of Colorado, Employer, and State Compensation Insurance Fund, Insurer.
En Banc.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice McWilliams]
Mr. Justice McWilliams
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The issue posed by this writ of error is whether the various statutory provisions found in C.R.S. 1963, 81-12-1 (5) (a) and (b) apply to the situation where a person, who is receiving weekly benefits under workmen’s compensation, is thereafter granted a disability annuity by the Public Employees’ Retirement Association of Colorado.
This issue has been considered by us in Myers v. State of Colorado, 162 Colo. 435, 428 P.2d 83.
In the Myers case we held that the aforementioned statute does apply to such a disability annuity.
The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Mr. Justice Day and Mr. Justice Pringle dissent.
[DISSENT — Mr. Justice. Day]
Mr. Justice. Day
dissents:
I dissent in this case for the reasons which I have set out in my dissenting opinion in Myers v. State of Colorado, 162 Colo. 435, 428 P.2d 83.