General
In the Matter of the Application of Nathan G. Ramer, Respondent, against John E. Sheehy, Commissioner of Parks, for the Borough of Manhattan in the Department of Parks, City of New York, Appellant
240 A.D. 962·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1933·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Nathan G. Ramer, Respondent, against John E. Sheehy, Commissioner of Parks, for the Borough of Manhattan in the Department of Parks, City of New York, Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.