Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
New York Mutual Savings and Loan Association, Respondent, v. Westchester Fire Insurance Company, Appellant, 1907 — 189 N.Y. 525 · caselaw · US
General
New York Mutual Savings and Loan Association, Respondent, v. Westchester Fire Insurance Company, Appellant
189 N.Y. 525·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
New York Mutual Savings and Loan Association, Respondent, v. Westchester Fire Insurance Company, Appellant.
H. 7. Mutual S. & L. Assn. v. Westchester Fire Ins. Go., 110 App. Div. 760, affirmed.
(Argued June 6, 1907;
decided October 1, 1907.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 26,1906, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon the report of a referee and granting a new trial in an action to recover on a policy of fire insurance.
Edgar J. Nathan and Raymond Reubenstein for appellant.
George Richards and Woodson R. Oglesby for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Yann, Willard Bartlett and Hiscook, JJ. Absent : Haight, J.