Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lewis v. Illinois; Lapean v. Wisconsin; Terry v. Nierstheimer, Warden; Griffin v. Nierstheimer, Warden, 1946 — 326 U.S. 801 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Lewis v. Illinois; Lapean v. Wisconsin; Terry v. Nierstheimer, Warden; Griffin v. Nierstheimer, Warden
326 U.S. 801·Supreme Court of the United States·1946
Mr. Justice Rutledge took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 628.
No. 642.
No. 681.
No. 684.
Lewis v. Illinois. Lapean v. Wisconsin. Terry v. Nierstheimer, Warden. Griffin v. Nierstheimer, Warden.
January 28, 1946.
Mr. W. C. Cherry for petitioner in No. 681.
[MAJORITY]
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois;
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin;
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois; and
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois.
The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied for the reason that applications therefor were not made within the time provided by law. §8 (a), Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 940), 28 U. S. C. § 350.
Mr. Justice Rutledge took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Reported below: No. 642, 247 Wis. 302, 19 N. W. 2d 289.