General
The Vio Chemical Company, Appellant, v. Caroline Hartman, Respondent
126 A.D. 924·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Vio Chemical Company, Appellant, v. Caroline Hartman, Respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, that the plaintiff failed to prove the cause of action alleged; that the daughter was the agent of the defendant in the execution of the papers, and that there was no proof of partnership between the daughter and the mother. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented upon the ground that the defendant, by failure to plead copartnership or joint liability, waived the same.