General

In the Matter of the Petition of Richard Scott et al., for an Order Requiring Clarence F. Birdseye, an Attorney and Counselor of the Supreme Court, to Pay over Certain Moneys

44 A.D. 629·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1899·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

In the Matter of the Petition of Richard Scott et al., for an Order Requiring Clarence F. Birdseye, an Attorney and Counselor of the Supreme Court, to Pay over Certain Moneys. Motion to confirm the.report of the referee granted, with ten dollars costs and disbursements of the reference and of the appeal to the appellant; and respondent directed to pay over, within twenty days, the amount collected by. him and still in his hands, with such costs and disbursements, after deducting therefrom the sum of §500. allowed by the referee. [MAJORITY] All concurred, except Cullen, J., not sitting.