General
State Division of Human Rights, on Complaint of Roosevelt Baggling, Petitioner, v. Sibley, Lindsay & Curr Company, Respondent
112 A.D.2d 16·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1985·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
State Division of Human Rights, on Complaint of Roosevelt Baggling, Petitioner, v Sibley, Lindsay & Cure Company, Respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed, without costs (see, State Div. of Human Rights v Ingersoll-Rand Co., 106 AD2d 917). (Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Green, O’Donnell and Pine, JJ.