Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Alfred C. Hough et al., Respondents, v. American Baptist Missionary Union, Appellant, 1871 — 46 N.Y. 682 · caselaw · US
General
Alfred C. Hough et al., Respondents, v. American Baptist Missionary Union, Appellant
46 N.Y. 682·New York Court of Appeals·1871·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Alfred C. Hough et al., Respondents, v. American Baptist Missionary Union, Appellant.
(Argued February 2d, 1871;
decided February 5th, 1871.)
A. B. Qojyvxell, for appellant.
J. Stcmley, for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
This case presents the same questions, ana is affirmed on the opinion written in White et al. exr. v. Howards et al. (ante, p. 144).