General
Herbert Rex, an Infant, by Charles M. Rex, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Coney Island and Brooklyn Railroad Company, Appellant, Impleaded with The Long Island Railroad Company
146 A.D. 924·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1911·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Herbert Rex, an Infant, by Charles M. Rex, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Coney Island and Brooklyn Railroad Company, Appellant, Impleaded with The Long Island Railroad Company.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Burr, Woodward and Rich, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P. J., and Hirschberg, J., dissented, upon the ground that' having reversed the judgment against the Long Island Railroad Company for reasons stated in the per curiam opinion (ante, p. 905),, they deem it wiser to have a new trial as to both defendants.