Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Lillian Tucker, Administratrix of the Estate of Sydney R. Tucker, Deceased, 1911 — 220 U.S. 608 · caselaw · US
General
The Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Lillian Tucker, Administratrix of the Estate of Sydney R. Tucker, Deceased
220 U.S. 608·Supreme Court of the United States·1911
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 521.
The Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Lillian Tucker, Administratrix of the Estate of Sydney R. Tucker, Deceased.
Error to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia.
Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted May 15, 1911.
Decided May 29, 1911.
Mr. Frederic D. McKenney, Mr. John Spalding Flannery and Mr. William tiitz for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. Levi H. David and Mr. Alvin L. Newmyer for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam,]
Per Curiam,
The judgment is affirmed with costs. El Paso & N. E. Ry. v. Gutierrez, 215 U. S. 87; Chicago, B. & Q. R. R. Co. v. McGuire, 219 U. S. 549.