Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Accounting of Daniel Talmage, as Executor of Catherine Elizabeth Swan, Deceased; Daniel Talmage, as Executor, Appellant; Olabence Rapelye et ah, Respondents, 1899 — 160 N.Y. 704 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Accounting of Daniel Talmage, as Executor of Catherine Elizabeth Swan, Deceased; Daniel Talmage, as Executor, Appellant; Olabence Rapelye et ah, Respondents
160 N.Y. 704·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Accounting of Daniel Talmage, as Executor of Catherine Elizabeth Swan, Deceased. Daniel Talmage, as Executor, Appellant; Olabence Rapelye et ah, Respondents.
(Argued October 34, 1899;
decided November 21, 1899.)
Matter of Talmage, 33 App. Div. 10, affirmed.
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered July 7, 1898, modifying and affirming, as modified, a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Queens county, directing Daniel Talmage, as.executor, to pay to Clarence Rapelye and Manett Nutt the sum of $2,000 with interest.
Hitchings, Palliser & Moen for appellant.
Arthur Van Dewater for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Haight, J., not voting, and O’Brien, J., absent.