Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Heiner, Former Collector of Internal Revenue, v. A. W. Mellon; and Same v. Jennie King Mellon et al., 1937 — 302 U.S. 672 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Heiner, Former Collector of Internal Revenue, v. A. W. Mellon; and Same v. Jennie King Mellon et al.
302 U.S. 672·Supreme Court of the United States·1937
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Stone took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 144.
No. 145.
Heiner, Former Collector of Internal Revenue, v. A. W. Mellon; and Same v. Jennie King Mellon et al.
October 11, 1937.
Solicitor General Reed for petitioner. Messrs. William Wallace Booth, John G. Frazer, and Donald D. Shepard for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit granted.
Reported below: 89 F. (2d) 141.
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Stone took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.