Bankruptcy
In re William HUNT, Bankrupt. LOCAL LOAN CO., Appellant, v. William HUNT, Appellee
67 F.2d 998·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In re William HUNT, Bankrupt. LOCAL LOAN CO., Appellant, v. William HUNT, Appellee.
No. 4936.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Nov. 17, 1933.
Frederic Burnham, David F. Rosenthal, and Orville W. Lee, all of Chicago, 111., for appellant.
Lloyd A. Faxon and Harry F. Wiggins, both of Chicago1, HI., for appellee.
Before ALSCHULER, EVANS, and SPARKS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The only material difference in the questions presented in this case and those presented in No. 4899, In re Edward W. Skorcz, Bankrupt, Trustees System Reineo Company v. Edward W. Skorcz, 67 F.(2d) 187, decided by this court on June 24, 1933, is that in the case at bar, bankrupt- had already secured -his discharge, while in the Skorcz Case, bankrupt’s petition for a discharge was pending. The distinction we think can make no difference, and the order of the District Court in the instant case is affirmed on the authority of the decision in the Skorcz case and the eases therein cited.