Corporations
Lithochrome Corporation, Inc., Respondent, v. Rochester Monotype Composition Co., Inc., et al., Appellants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. James Lewandowski et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents
269 A.D.2d 873705 N.Y.S.2d 481·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2000·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lithochrome Corporation, Inc., Respondent, v Rochester Monotype Composition Co., Inc., et al., Appellants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. James Lewandowski et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.
[705 NYS2d 481]
[MAJORITY]
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, VanStrydonck, J. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, VanStrydonck, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Hayes, J. P., Wisner, Pigott, Jr., Scudder and Lawton, JJ.