General
State of Connecticut v. Frank Rogers
210 Conn. 805·Connecticut Supreme Court·1989·CT
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
State of Connecticut v. Frank Rogers
Robert M. Casale, in support of the petition.
Harry Weller, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Decided January 12, 1989
[MAJORITY]
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 16 Conn. App. 245, is granted, limited to the following issue: ,
“Did the Appellate Court err in affirming the defendant’s conviction and holding that the wiretap panel’s failure to make a written determination of probable cause, pursuant to General Statutes §§ 54-41d (7) and 51-41e, that a special need existed to intercept wire communications over a public telephone was not reversible error?”