Contracts · MBE-tested
Connor v. California et al.
309 U.S. 631·Supreme Court of the United States·1940
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 562.
Connor v. California et al.
March 25, 1940.
Frank S. Connor, pro se and Mr. H. Thomas Austern for petitioner.
Messrs. Earl Warren, Attorney General of California, and Everett W. Mattoon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion for a writ ,of certiorari to correct a diminution of the record is denied. The motion to' remand is granted, the judgment is vacated and the cause is remanded to the Supreme Court of California for further consideration of the application for habeas corpus.'