Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO v. Hamilton Steel Products, Inc., et al., 1969 — 394 U.S. 1000 · caselaw · US
General
United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO v. Hamilton Steel Products, Inc., et al.
394 U.S. 1000·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Fortas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1174.
United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO v. Hamilton Steel Products, Inc., et al.
Bernard Kleiman, Gilbert Feldman, Elliot Bredhoff, Michael H. Gottesman, and George H. Cohen for petitioner.
J. Robert Geiman for respondent Union Central Life Insurance Co.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Fortas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.