Contracts · MBE-tested
Stephen PETE on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA WELFARE AND RETIREMENT FUND OF 1950 et al., Appellants; Slimp KISER, on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated plaintiffs, et al. v. UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA WELFARE AND RETIREMENT FUND OF 1950, et al., Appellants
517 F.2d 1274·United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit·1974
Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, and WRIGHT, McGOWAN, TAMM, LEVEN-THAL, ROBINSON, MacKINNON, ROBB and WILKEY, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Stephen PETE on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA WELFARE AND RETIREMENT FUND OF 1950 et al., Appellants. Slimp KISER, on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated plaintiffs, et al. v. UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA WELFARE AND RETIREMENT FUND OF 1950, et al., Appellants.
Nos. 73-1270, 73-1393.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Oct. 2, 1974.
Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, and WRIGHT, McGOWAN, TAMM, LEVEN-THAL, ROBINSON, MacKINNON, ROBB and WILKEY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
On consideration of the “Petition for Rehearing En Banc” and the “Petition for Rehearing and/or Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc”, it is
Ordered by the Court en banc that the above entitled cases shall be reheard by the Court sitting en bane at 2:00 P.M. Wednesday, October 23, 1974.