Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Toledo Pressed Steel Co. v. Standard Parts, Inc.; and Same v. Huebner Supply Co., 1938 — 305 U.S. 667 · caselaw · US
General
Toledo Pressed Steel Co. v. Standard Parts, Inc.; and Same v. Huebner Supply Co.
305 U.S. 667·Supreme Court of the United States·1938
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 166.
No. 167.
Toledo Pressed Steel Co. v. Standard Parts, Inc.; and Same v. Huebner Supply Co.
November 21, 1938.
Mr. Wilber Owen for petitioner.
Messrs. William P. Bair and Will Freeman for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
The petition for rehearing is granted. The orders denying certiorari, ante, p. 600, are vacated and the petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is granted.
Reported below: 93 F. 2d 336.