Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Floersheim et al. v. Powers, Director of the Department of Propessional and Vocational Standards of California, 1968 — 391 U.S. 951 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Floersheim et al. v. Powers, Director of the Department of Propessional and Vocational Standards of California
391 U.S. 951·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1327.
Floersheim et al. v. Powers, Director of the Department of Propessional and Vocational Standards of California.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Murray M. Chotiner for petitioners.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Warren H. Leering, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.