Torts · MBE-tested
Chadwick-Miller Importers, Inc. v. United States, protest 62/18542 (Boston)
59 Cust. Ct. 873·United States Customs Court·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Before the Second Division,
August 1, 1967
No. P67/257.
Chadwick-Miller Importers, Inc. v. United States, protest 62/18542 (Boston).
[MAJORITY — Rao, C. J.]
Rao, C. J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of battery-operated manicure sets; that said merchandise contains as an essential feature - an electrical element or device without which said articles would not operate, and does not contain an electrical heating element; and that the principles involved are the same as those in Bruce Duncan Company, a/c Sims-Worms v. United States (45 Cust. Ct. 85, C.D. 2202), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.