Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
McCarthy et al. v. Contessa et al., New York State Board of Elections, 1976 — 429 U.S. 908 · caselaw · US
General
McCarthy et al. v. Contessa et al., New York State Board of Elections
429 U.S. 908·Supreme Court of the United States·1976
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
October 29, 1976
No. A-342.
McCarthy et al. v. Contessa et al., New York State Board of Elections.
[MAJORITY]
Application for stay of judgment of the Court of Appeals of New York, dated October 28, 1976, presented to Mr. Justice Marshall, and by' him referred to the Court, denied.