Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al., 1948 — 335 U.S. 853 · caselaw · US
General
Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
335 U.S. 853·Supreme Court of the United States·1948
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 262.
Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
John C. Benson for petitioner.
Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Morison, Paul A. Sweeney, Melvin Richter, Lambert McAllister and S. W. Jensch for the Federal Power Commission; and L. E. Melrin and Charles E. Nieman for the Mondakota Gas Co., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.