Contracts · MBE-tested
Robert Lee Harper, EN3, U. S. Coast Guard v. CDR D. B. Thurnher, USCG, Commanding Officer (Acting), USCGC EDISTO (WAGB 284), Convening Authority and ADM Chester R. Bender, USCG, Commandant
22 C.M.A. 657·United States Court of Military Appeals·1973
Chief Judge Darden would dismiss the petition for the relief sought is not in aid of this Court’s jurisdiction. · Judge Duncan would order the respondents to show cause why the relief sought should not be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
June 25, 1973
No. 73-32
Robert Lee Harper, EN3, U. S. Coast Guard v. CDR D. B. Thurnher, USCG, Commanding Officer (Acting), USCGC EDISTO (WAGB 284), Convening Authority and ADM Chester R. Bender, USCG, Commandant.
[MAJORITY]
On consideration of the "Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the Nature of a Writ of Mandamus,” filed in the above-entitled action, it is, by the Court, this 25th day of June 1973,
ORDERED:
That said petition be, and the same hereby is, dismissed. Bumpus v. Thurnher, Miscellaneous Docket No. 73-31, June 25, 1973.
Chief Judge Darden would dismiss the petition for the relief sought is not in aid of this Court’s jurisdiction.
Judge Duncan would order the respondents to show cause why the relief sought should not be granted.