General
Gelina Mombeleur et al., Respondents, v. Pablo Salazar, Appellant
258 A.D.2d 612683 N.Y.S.2d 869·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1999·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Gelina Mombeleur et al., Respondents, v Pablo Salazar, Appellant.
[683 NYS2d 869]
[MAJORITY]
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kitzes, J.), dated July 17, 1998, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint based upon the failure of the plaintiff Gelina Mombeleur to sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The record presents a triable issue of fact (see, CPLR 3212 [b]) as to whether the plaintiff Gelina Mombeleur sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Mangano, P. J., Joy, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.