Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corp., 1970 — 397 U.S. 960 · caselaw · US
General
Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corp.
397 U.S. 960·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1058.
Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corp.
Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Norman C. Amaker, and Earl M. Johnson for petitioner. William Y. Akerman and Clark C. Vogel for respondent. Solicitor General Gris-wold, Assistant Attorney General Leonard, Lawrence G. Wallace, Robert T. Moore, and Stanley P. Hebert for the United States as amicus curiae in support of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted.