Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Joel A. Hamilton, Respondent, v. Owego Water Works, Appellant, 1900 — 163 N.Y. 562 · caselaw · US
General
Joel A. Hamilton, Respondent, v. Owego Water Works, Appellant
163 N.Y. 562·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joel A. Hamilton, Respondent, v. Owego Water Works, Appellant.
Hamilton v. Owego Water Works, 88 App. Div. 573, affirmed.
(Argued March 28, 1900;
decided May 15, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in favor of plaintiff December 18, 1897, upon an order of the Appellate Division in the third judicial department, reversing an order of the trial court granting a motion for a new trial after a verdict had been found in favor of plaintiff.
Marti/n, S. Lynch for appellant.
S. D. Ealliday for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Not sitting : Landon, J. -