Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
HARRISON WHOLESALE COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. Arthur H. LAMBORN, Gerard P. Tameling, Chas. V. Riggs, Henry B. Hutchings, Clarence G. Troup, Karl E. Lingren, Geo. H. Logan, Victor R. Hess, N. Nelson Keen, B. Wheeler Dyer, and William V. Wood, All Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Lamborn & Co., Defendants in Error, 1926 — 15 F.2d 1012 · caselaw · US
General
HARRISON WHOLESALE COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. Arthur H. LAMBORN, Gerard P. Tameling, Chas. V. Riggs, Henry B. Hutchings, Clarence G. Troup, Karl E. Lingren, Geo. H. Logan, Victor R. Hess, N. Nelson Keen, B. Wheeler Dyer, and William V. Wood, All Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Lamborn & Co., Defendants in Error
15 F.2d 1012·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
HARRISON WHOLESALE COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. Arthur H. LAMBORN, Gerard P. Tameling, Chas. V. Riggs, Henry B. Hutchings, Clarence G. Troup, Karl E. Lingren, Geo. H. Logan, Victor R. Hess, N. Nelson Keen, B. Wheeler Dyer, and William V. Wood, All Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Lamborn & Co., Defendants in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
November 23, 1926.)
No. 2518.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Washington; Isaac M. Meekins, Judge.
A. D. MaeLean, of Washington, N. C. (Stephen C. Bragaw, of Washington, N. C., on 'the brief), for plaintiff in error.
H. G. Connor, Jr., of Wilson, N. C. (Hitch, Denmark & Lovett, of Savannah, Ga., on the brief), for defendants in error.
Before WADDILL and ROSE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon authority of Bell v. Lamborn (C. C. A.) 2 F.(2d) 205, Angelo v. Lamborn (C. C. A.) 2 F.(2d) 854, and Randolph Grocery Co. v. Lamborn (C. C. A.) 3 F.(2d) 139, affirmed.