General
UNITED STATES v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO.
69 F.2d 107·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO.
No. 282.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Feb. 13, 1934.
Robert M. McCormick, of New York City (Andrew Eckel, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Howard W. Ameli, U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N. Y. (Herbert H. Kellogg and Albert D. Smith, Asst. U. S. Attys., both of Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel), for the United States.
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is from an interlocutory order from which no appeal lies. Rexford v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co., 228 U. S. 339, 33 S. Ct. 515, 57 L. Ed. 864; Cory Bros. & Co. v. United States, 47 F.(2d) 607 (C. C. A. 2); Bush v. Leach, 22 F.(2d) 296 (C. C. A. 2); Radio Corp. v. Bunnell & Co., 298 F. 62 (C. C. A. 2); France & Canada S. S. Co. v. French Republic, 285 F. 290 (C. C. A. 2).
Appeal dismissed.