Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Wassermann v. Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York, 1962 — 371 U.S. 861 · caselaw · US
General
Wassermann v. Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York
371 U.S. 861·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 227.
Wassermann v. Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York.
Jacob Rassner for petitioner.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New
York, Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, and Robert W. Bush, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Third Judicial Department. Certiorari denied.