Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Anna C. Dunham et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Clara V. Kauffman et al., 1916 — 241 U.S. 653 · caselaw · US
General
Anna C. Dunham et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Clara V. Kauffman et al.
241 U.S. 653·Supreme Court of the United States·1916
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 189.
Anna C. Dunham et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Clara V. Kauffman et al.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Ohio.
Argued May 4, 1916.
Decided May 22, 1916.
Mr. D. K. Watson for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Charles C. Pavey for the defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 314; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137. (2) The Pennsylvania College Cases, 13 Wall. 190; Newburyport Water Co. v. Newburyport, 193 U. S. 561; Missouri Pacific Ry. v. Kansas, 216 U. S. 262, 274-275. (3) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Ennis Water Works v. Ennis, 233 U. S. 652, 658; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469, 471.