General
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jemel McCaskill, Also Known as Jamel McCaskill, Appellant
88 A.D.3d 578931 N.Y.S.2d 222·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2011·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jemel McCaskill, Also Known as Jamel McCaskill, Appellant.
[931 NYS2d 222]
[MAJORITY]
The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]). Concur— Tom, J.E, Andrias, Catterson, Acosta and Renwick, JJ.