Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Second National Bank of Richmond, Kentucky, Plaintiff in Error, v. C. N. Fitzpatrick et al., 1903 — 189 U.S. 508 · caselaw · US
General
Second National Bank of Richmond, Kentucky, Plaintiff in Error, v. C. N. Fitzpatrick et al.
189 U.S. 508·Supreme Court of the United States·1903
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 237.
Second National Bank of Richmond, Kentucky, Plaintiff in Error, v. C. N. Fitzpatrick et al.
Error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky.
Argued April 15, 1903.
Decided April 27, 1903.
Mr. J. A. Sullivan for plaintiff in error.
No appearance for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Writ of error dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, on the authority of Haseltine v. Central Bank, 183 U. S. 130.