General

Gregory Young et al., Respondents, v. Dmitri Noskov et al., Respondents, and Thomas Kurien, Appellant

299 A.D.2d 353749 N.Y.S.2d 155·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2002·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Gregory Young et al., Respondents, v Dmitri Noskov et al., Respondents, and Thomas Kurien, Appellant. [749 NYS2d 155] [MAJORITY] In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Thomas Kurien appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schulman, J.), entered March 15, 2002, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against him. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs. The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the appellant’s motion as untimely. In light of this determination, we need not reach the appellant’s remaining contentions. O’Brien, J.P., Krausman, Townes and Rivera, JJ., concur.