General
Joe Sotomayor, Appellant, v. Yarmouth Lumber et al., Respondents
60 A.D.3d 840874 N.Y.S.2d 379·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2009·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joe Sotomayor, Appellant, v Yarmouth Lumber et al., Respondents.
[874 NYS2d 379] —
[MAJORITY]
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), dated May 14, 2008, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendants established, prima facie, their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Fisher, J.P., Angiolillo, Balkin and Belen, JJ., concur.