Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
National Organization for Women, Inc., et al. v. Idaho et al.; National Organization for Women, Inc., et al. v. Idaho et al.; Carmen, Administrator of General Services v. Idaho et al.; Carmen, Administrator of General Services v. Idaho et al., 1982 — 459 U.S. 809 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
National Organization for Women, Inc., et al. v. Idaho et al.; National Organization for Women, Inc., et al. v. Idaho et al.; Carmen, Administrator of General Services v. Idaho et al.; Carmen, Administrator of General Services v. Idaho et al.
459 U.S. 809·Supreme Court of the United States·1982
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 81-1282.
No. 81-1283.
No. 81-1312.
No. 81-1313.
National Organization for Women, Inc., et al. v. Idaho et al. National Organization for Women, Inc., et al. v. Idaho et al. Carmen, Administrator of General Services v. Idaho et al. Carmen, Administrator of General Services v. Idaho et al.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from D. C. Idaho. [Probable jurisdiction postponed, 455 U. S. 918];
C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari before judgment granted, 455 U. S. 918];
Appeal from D. C. Idaho. [Probable jurisdiction postponed, 455 U. S. 918]; and
C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari before judgment granted, 455 U. S. 918.] Upon consideration of the memorandum for the Administrator of General Services suggesting mootness, filed July 9, 1982, and the responses thereto, the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Idaho is vacated and the cases are remanded to that court with instructions to dismiss the complaints as moot. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U. S. 36 (1950).