Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Sidney W. Barnard et al., Appellants, v. Julius Adorjan et al., Defendants, and Barney Lantry, Respondent, 1908 — 191 N.Y. 556 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Sidney W. Barnard et al., Appellants, v. Julius Adorjan et al., Defendants, and Barney Lantry, Respondent
191 N.Y. 556·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Sidney W. Barnard et al., Appellants, v. Julius Adorjan et al., Defendants, and Barney Lantry, Respondent.
Barnard v. Adorjan, 116 App. Div. 535, affirmed.
(Argued March 3, 1908;
decided March 31, 1908.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 8, 1907, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and granting a newtiial in an action by vendors of real estate to foreclose a contract of sale.
George Lawyer and Thomas Cantwell for appellants.
John C. Little for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellants on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.