Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Carl D. Jackson, Doing Business under the Name of C. D. Jackson and Company, Appellant, v. Otto Volkening, Doing Business under the Name of Volkening and Company, Respondent, 1904 — 178 N.Y. 562 · caselaw · US
General
Carl D. Jackson, Doing Business under the Name of C. D. Jackson and Company, Appellant, v. Otto Volkening, Doing Business under the Name of Volkening and Company, Respondent
178 N.Y. 562·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Carl D. Jackson, Doing Business under the Name of C. D. Jackson and Company, Appellant, v. Otto Volkening, Doing Business under the Name of Volkening and Company, Respondent.
Jackson v. Voikening, 81 App. Div. 36, affirmed.
(Argued March 1, 1904;
decided March 16, 1904.)
Appeal from ail order of the Appellate Division of the .Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered. March 19, 1903, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court and granting a new trial.
Frederick: JIulse and Ernest F. Eidlitz for appellant.
Carlisle Norwood for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for defendant on the stipulation, with costs; no opinion.
Concur : O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Absent: Parker, Oh. J.